2030 Agenda

The environment has been the great absentee from this electoral campaign and despite the public vote to include it in the debate, it also had a secondary role in front of the cameras. The only one who made a clear defense was Bregman, who called for a wetland law and positioned himself against open-pit mining and offshore oil exploitation. “Milei defends the freedom of companies to contaminate rivers. He went so far as to say that climate change is an invention of socialism,” Bregman said. Milei, who denies that climate change is caused by human beings, also categorically refused to maintain the environmental commitments made by Argentina to the international community. “We are not going to adhere to the 2030 Agenda. We do not adhere to cultural Marxism,” he replied to Schiaretti.

The final minute was the last bullet of the debate and Milei and Massa were the ones who used it best. The ultra candidate made a great summary of the entire campaign strategy of the far-right party La Libertad Avanza. “The political caste is teasing us,” Milei said, stressing that politicians “cannot be the solution to the problem because they are part of the problem” and asking out loud to Argentines if they believe “that a different Argentina can be with the same as always.” Massa, for his part, tried to differentiate himself from his rivals by asking the Argentines not to vote backwards, in reference to Bullrich, nor the “leap into the void” that Milei proposes to them. The Argentines are summoned to the polls in two weeks.

The Argentine “reliable leaders” financed by Soros: from the right to the left they are all

The list of Argentine “referents” that are funded by the tycoon George Soros was leaked on the website. Whose faces and surnames appear on the cover, without any of them having denied it, thus tacitly giving consent to its veracity. Opening the serious question of who they really represent, whether the Argentine people, or the globalizing forces of mega business and finance. Also explaining relevant issues, such as the abortion promotion law, whose opinion is divided in society and mostly against, but they had the unanimous support of these notable sororas and sorophils.

By Javier Llorens – 12/16/2018

Currently, as a way to clean up the judicial cases for the illegal contributions to politics afflict the large political parties, especially the one that currently governs, an attempt is being made to sanction in Congress a law that enables electoral contributions by companies, which is currently prohibited.

But nothing is said about the contributions and actions of NGOs, which can be something much more dangerous, as evidenced by the leaked document of the Open Society Foundations, with the suggestive title “Reliable allies in Latin America 2018 – Reliable leaders for OSF (Open Society Foundations) and OSI (Open Society Institute) – Argentine references committed to the values of the OSF and willing to collaborate in legislative development and new regulatory frameworks.”

Consequently, the question, willing to collaborate with whom? With NGOs of more than dubious trajectories, questioned in various parts of the world? And inspired, no one knows well by whom, and what are the real objectives that assist them, and the interests that finance them? This is actually the least, since it is in itself an acute prejudice to the democratic system, since there is a clandestine, hidden, and strange interference in the current system of government. Which has nothing to do with politics, nor with the democratic representative system.

And it is too similar to a synarchy, which is the system in which power is exercised by an elite or corporation. Word that derives from the Greek prefix: “syn”, which means with or together, and “archy”, which means rule. Which, according to the Royal Spanish Academy, is the power constituted by several princes, each of whom administers a part of the State. Or in which it has a decisive influence, a group of companies or powerful people in the political and economic affairs of a country.

The most important use of the word “synarchy” comes from the writings of Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre (1842-1909), who in his work “L’Archéomètre” (“The Archaeometer”) used the notion of synarchy to describe the government by the members of a secret society, named Agharta, which exercised real power after the appearance of a government of another type. With a certain resemblance to Masonic societies.

And this seems to be the case of Soros, the Open Society, and its cohort of sororas and sorophils. Whose list is reproduced alphabetically below, stating the position he holds or held, which appears in English in the filtered list. Also analyzing the remarkably uniform behavior of its members, regarding the controversial abortion legalization project.

The Open Society is open to everything

The Open Society Foundations (OSF) is an international network of foundations, created by speculative business tycoon George Soros. Who made his fortune based on the premise ” find a trend whose premise is false, and bet your money against it.” And so he became rich and enriched by betting against the pound and other currencies, which he also did in Argentina with the future dollar in 2015, as foreseeing the rise to power of current President Mauricio Macri. This allowed him to pocket a profit of almost three billion pesos, then equivalent to 200 million dollars.