Gloria Álvarez, a prominent voice in libertarian thought and often regarded as one of the most influential libertarians in Latin America, has taken a clear stance on former U.S. President Donald Trump. While some in the libertarian community may have supported Trump’s presidency due to his calls for deregulation and tax cuts, Álvarez argues that Trump fundamentally diverges from core libertarian values. She points out that his actions and rhetoric are often authoritarian, undermining the principles of individual liberty, free markets, and limited government.

1. The Libertarian Rejection of Authoritarianism

At the core of libertarian philosophy is the rejection of authoritarianism in all forms. Libertarians believe that government should interfere as little as possible in the lives of individuals, protecting their freedoms rather than dictating their choices. Álvarez sees Trump’s frequent displays of authoritarian tendencies as a direct contradiction to these values. From his executive orders circumventing Congress to his rhetoric encouraging strong-arm tactics in law enforcement, Trump has shown a willingness to centralize power rather than limit it.

2. Protectionism Over Free Markets

Another key libertarian principle is support for free markets, where individuals and businesses can operate without government-imposed barriers. Trump’s record on trade policies directly conflicts with this. His “America First” agenda promoted tariffs and trade restrictions on imports from several countries, which runs counter to the open, unrestricted markets that libertarians advocate. Álvarez and other libertarians argue that protectionist policies ultimately hurt consumers by limiting competition, raising prices, and stifling economic innovation.

3. Immigration Policies and Individual Freedom

Libertarians traditionally support open immigration, arguing that individuals should be free to move and pursue better opportunities without government interference. Trump’s hardline stance on immigration, including policies that led to family separations and strict border controls, is seen by Álvarez as a rejection of this principle. Libertarians argue that immigration contributes to economic growth and cultural diversity, and restrictions undermine the idea of individual autonomy and the right to seek a better life.

4. Nationalism and Populism: Opposed to Individualism

Álvarez also critiques Trump’s use of nationalist rhetoric, which she argues conflicts with the libertarian emphasis on individualism. While Trump’s message resonated with those feeling left behind by globalization, Álvarez contends that his approach encouraged a “us versus them” mentality that contradicts the libertarian ethos of individual responsibility and personal freedom. Nationalism, she argues, can lead to collectivism, where individual rights are subordinated to the interests of the nation, a stance completely incompatible with libertarian thought.

5. Questionable Commitment to Civil Liberties

Libertarians hold civil liberties as inviolable, believing that government power should be limited to protect individuals’ rights to free expression, privacy, and personal autonomy. Álvarez highlights Trump’s willingness to restrict civil liberties for perceived political gains, including his calls for surveillance and censorship of media outlets critical of him, as well as his dismissal of peaceful protests. Libertarians view these actions as antithetical to their commitment to protect civil liberties against government overreach.

6. Limited Government or Consolidation of Power?

One of the cornerstones of libertarian thought is the desire to reduce the size and power of government. Álvarez points to Trump’s expansion of executive power as a major failing in this regard. Instead of fostering limited government, Trump often bypassed checks and balances to issue executive orders, demonstrating a preference for personal authority rather than constitutional limits. Álvarez argues that true libertarians reject this kind of power grab and advocate for the decentralization of authority.

Conclusion: The Incompatibility of Trumpism and Libertarianism

Gloria Álvarez’s stance against Trump is rooted in a commitment to authentic libertarian principles—freedom of the individual, free markets, limited government, and opposition to authoritarianism. For Álvarez, Trump’s tenure in office displayed tendencies that are fundamentally opposed to these ideals. By emphasizing nationalism, protectionism, and a willingness to centralize power, Trump has shown himself to be an advocate of populist and authoritarian policies, which stand in stark contrast to the ideals of liberty.

Álvarez’s voice resonates strongly in the libertarian community, especially among those concerned that libertarianism should not be co-opted by populist or nationalist movements. For those who wish to see a genuine libertarian candidate, she positions herself as a principled alternative, committed to a platform that fully embodies libertarian values.

https://twitter.com/GloriaAlvarez85/status/1795949367150477443